People who electronically share an officer’s personal details publicly would face felony charges only if all intent and harm requirements apply, with speech and reporting exceptions.
Electronically sharing an identifiable officer’s personal details on a public website or forum would be a third-degree felony if intended to seriously disrupt their life, paired with harmful intent or reckless disregard for specified risks, and causing significant financial harm, emotional distress, or fear of serious injury or death. Speech and reporting exceptions apply.
Exceptions would cover protected speech, sharing information with the press, and reporting conduct reasonably believed unlawful. Listed communications providers would face no liability under this section when acting as service providers.
People who intentionally share an officer’s personal information electronically on a public website or forum would face a third-degree felony if every required test is met. The officer must be identifiable from the shared information itself. The speech and reporting exceptions described below would apply. The person must intend to cause a major disruption in the officer’s life. The person must also intend harm or harassment, or recklessly disregard a reasonable likelihood of death, bodily injury, or a violation of Ohio section 2903.211. The sharing must cause the officer significant financial harm, emotional distress, or fear of serious injury or death for themselves or a covered family or household member. Covered family includes current or former household members who are spouses, former spouses, partners living as spouses, foster parents, or relatives by blood or marriage of the officer or those spouses or partners. It also includes a child’s natural parent when the officer is or is alleged to be the other natural parent.
The prohibition would exclude protected speech, sharing information with the press, reporting suspected unlawful conduct, and lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence work by law enforcement or U.S. intelligence agencies. Constitutionally protected speech, journalism, protest, assembly, and petitions would be exempt. Giving personal information to the press would also be exempt. Reports of unlawful conduct must rest on a reasonable belief that the conduct is unlawful. For reports of crimes to law enforcement, the person must reasonably believe the alleged crime occurred. Agency work must be lawfully authorized investigative, protective, or intelligence activity by a law enforcement agency or a U.S. intelligence agency. The person sharing the information must reasonably believe the activity is legitimate. The listed internet, telephone, mobile, and cable providers would be protected only when acting as service providers.
No hearings or votes scheduled.