Hunters would face a ban on methods involving beating wildlife, and the Game Commission could restrict hunting rights in wildlife-beating and aggravated animal cruelty cases.
People would be barred from hunting or helping others hunt with methods that involve beating wildlife, except where Pennsylvania's game law allows otherwise.
The Game Commission would be allowed to restrict hunting rights for a period it sets in wildlife-beating and aggravated animal cruelty cases. A wildlife-beating accusation could qualify without a conviction.
People would be barred from hunting or helping others hunt using methods that involve beating game or wildlife. The rule would also cover people who encourage or plan with others to hunt using these methods. The ban would apply except where Pennsylvania's game law allows otherwise. The ban would take effect 60 days after enactment.
The Game Commission would be allowed to revoke hunting or trapping licenses and deny hunting rights. Covered cases would include accusations of beating wildlife during hunts, convictions or admissions of guilt for that conduct, and aggravated animal cruelty cases. For aggravated animal cruelty, a conviction, guilty plea, or no-contest plea would qualify, including for a similar offense in another state. The commission could set the length of a ban on hunting or taking wildlife, even without a license. These provisions would take effect 60 days after enactment.
No hearings or votes scheduled.