Residents could search water compliance records, and state officials would hold local hearings after issuing notices of significant deficiencies, a term defined in state rules.
State water officials would maintain a public database by January 1, 2028. People could search water suppliers’ violations, enforcement records, and covered test results by community or supplier.
After issuing a significant deficiency notice, state water officials would hold a hearing in the affected community. They would then publish possible solutions and allow at least 30 days for comments.
State water officials would maintain a searchable public database of water suppliers’ compliance records and water test results. For each supplier, records would include violations and significant deficiencies on or after January 1, 2013, enforcement action, and violation outcomes and status. People must be able to search by community name and water supplier. The test results covered are those from water sampled and analyzed under section 7. Test results must be published within one month after they are reported to the department.
State water officials would hold a local hearing and publish possible solutions for public comment. The trigger is a department-issued notice of a significant deficiency involving a violation. State drinking water rules define that term. Officials must consult the affected public water supplier before publishing the options they are considering. The hearing must explain the problem and identify concerns that enforcement needs to address. The hearing must occur within 30 days after the department issues the deficiency notice. The notice of possible solutions must follow within 30 days after the hearing.
No hearings or votes scheduled.