Utilities would keep large computing sites’ added costs off other customers’ bills for connections on or after enactment, while preserving service deals regulators approved before enactment.
Large computing sites connecting on or after enactment would pay their added utility costs even after ending service. Deals regulators approved before enactment would stay in effect.
For large computing sites connecting on or after enactment, utilities would require payments or financial guarantees before building or upgrading power facilities. Deals regulators approved before enactment would stay in effect.
Computing sites would owe their full added utility costs even after ending a power contract or stopping power purchases. Sites must mainly house computing equipment. The 20-megawatt minimum counts sites under common ownership or control together and phased projects at their expected full size. Utility cost estimates made near startup would need federal or state approval. Service deals regulators approved before enactment would remain in effect. These payment rules would apply to sites connecting on or after enactment.
Utilities would require payments or financial guarantees covering the cost of needed power facilities or upgrades. Sites must mainly house computing equipment. The 20-megawatt minimum counts sites under common ownership or control together and phased projects at their expected full size. Payments or guarantees already given to a public utility or transmission operator for the same work would count toward the requirement. Service deals regulators approved before enactment would remain in effect. For connections on or after enactment, utilities would require this backing before construction or upgrades begin.
No hearings or votes scheduled.