Duly elected members of local governing bodies would face limits on signing agreements that stop them from discussing public concerns tied to official duties.
Duly elected members of local governing bodies would not be allowed to sign agreements during their terms that block discussion of public concerns tied to official work. Covered agreements would be void and unenforceable, with exceptions for personal privacy, legally confidential matters, and active investigations; agreements made or renewed before July 1, 2027, would remain unaffected.
Duly elected members of local governing bodies would be barred from signing these nondisclosure agreements during their terms, and covered agreements would be void and unenforceable. It covers agreements that stop a member from discussing community-wide concerns connected to official duties, including government wrongdoing, violations of law, and gross mismanagement. A member could still sign an agreement to protect their own privacy interests in facts about official duties, if those facts reasonably raise privacy concerns and the member chooses to limit disclosure. Agreements also could protect matters that federal or state law requires to remain confidential, and information about active civil or criminal investigations. The provision would not affect any agreement entered into or renewed before July 1, 2027.
No hearings or votes scheduled.