New Jersey officials would use evidence rules that bar assumptions favoring a species as a precaution when deciding which wildlife and plants need protection.
State officials would use evidence that accounts for errors to decide which wildlife and plants need protection. They could not make assumptions favoring protection as a precaution.
Officials would leave economic and other impacts out of decisions about which native wildlife and plants found in New Jersey need protection.
State environmental officials would apply defined evidence rules when deciding which species need protection. These rules would cover state decisions about endangered wildlife and native plants. Evidence would need to account for known or possible errors and follow accepted scientific methods. Officials could not use assumptions favoring a species as a precaution. These rules would take effect immediately if the bill becomes law.
Officials would decide which species need protection without weighing economic or other impacts. This limit would apply to wildlife native to New Jersey and plant species found in the state. This limit would take effect immediately if the bill becomes law.
No hearings or votes scheduled.