If enacted, many Oregon waterways would enter a federal conservation system with planning deadlines and mineral limits, while specified existing private, water, utility, and Tribal rights remain.
Many named waterways, lakes, wetlands, and watersheds, mostly in Oregon, would receive federal conservation status. New Oregon segments would generally include an average of 640 acres per river mile.
Federal land in Oregon river areas, specified wetlands, and listed Illinois watershed areas would be closed to new mining, mineral leasing, and certain public-land transfers. Valid existing rights would remain.
Federal land managers would follow set deadlines for river management plans. Plans would assess wildfire and evacuation risks, consider fire and invasive-species work, and address culturally important native species when a Tribe asks.
Federal river managers could share administration and emergency services with Tribal, state, and local governments. If Congress provides money, they could restore Oregon river areas that supply drinking water or suffered catastrophic wildfire damage.
Specified existing private rights, contracts, utility work, water rights, and Tribal rights would remain. Agencies could not acquire land, or include Tribal land in a river boundary, without consent.
The proposal would classify many waterways as wild, scenic, or recreational parts of a federal conservation system. Most covered segments are in Oregon, while some extend into California or Washington. New Oregon segments would include an average of 640 acres per river mile. Segments designated before enactment, and later adjustments to those segments, would keep their existing management boundaries. Some designations expressly exclude nonfederal land or limit management plans outside Oregon. The 640-acre boundary rule would apply to Oregon segments designated on or after enactment.
The proposal would block new mining claims, mineral and geothermal leasing, and certain public-land transfers on covered federal land. Covered land includes federal land in Oregon wild-and-scenic river areas, specified wetlands and land supporting their water flow, and listed Illinois watershed management areas. Valid existing rights would remain. For the wetlands, agencies would publish draft maps within one year after enactment, allow 90 days for public comments, and then publish final maps after responding.
Federal land managers would schedule and prepare or update a management plan for each covered segment. Plans must assess wildfire, public safety, evacuation routes, invasive species, and fire's long-term role. Requirements for prioritizing treatments would exclude wilderness land. At a Tribe's request, officials must assess culturally important native species and develop a plan with the Tribe. Optional ecosystem projects would require collaboration and an environmental review finding that they are appropriate. Schedules must be published by the end of the first fiscal year beginning after enactment. Planning must start by the next plan revision or the end of the 10th full fiscal year, whichever comes first, and finish within five years.
Federal agencies could sign cooperation agreements and must encourage nearby governments to help plan and administer river areas. Agreements with Tribal, state, and local governments could cover river administration, rescue, firefighting, and law enforcement, with or without reimbursement. Federal managers could also restore eligible Oregon river areas. Restoration would depend on Congress providing money and must follow federal wild-and-scenic river law. Eligible areas must supply drinking water to downstream communities or have damage from a catastrophic wildfire.
Federal officials would have to honor specified private, utility, water, and Tribal interests while administering covered segments. Protections cover existing contracts, facility repairs, access to private land, utility lines and permitted utility work, valid water rights, and Tribal jurisdiction and treaty rights. Officials could still permit grazing under applicable laws. An owner must consent before the federal government acquires covered land or an interest in it. A Tribal government must expressly consent before Tribal or trust land is included in a covered segment.
No hearings or votes scheduled.