The Navy secretary would obtain a history review before naming or renaming a vessel and provide written explanations to defense committees and the public.
Published standards would guide Navy vessel names. Each decision would need a history review and written reasons, including extra explanations for rejecting historians’ main recommendation or replacing an existing name.
The Navy secretary would publish objective standards and written reasons for vessel names. The process would cover naming and renaming Navy vessels. Departing from the Navy history office’s main recommendation would require an explanation. Renaming would also require the old name’s historical meaning and reasons for removing it. Written determinations would go to defense committees and be public as allowed by law. A written history review would be required before naming or renaming a vessel.
No hearings or votes scheduled.