School boards would have to approve assistant state monitors, while state monitors would serve 24-month terms and face limits on students’ special education placements.
Before adding an assistant to a district’s state monitor, the education commissioner would have to explain why in writing and get a recorded yes vote from a majority of all school board members.
State monitors would serve 24 months. Districts would then have 12 months without that monitor’s direct oversight before the commissioner could reappoint one, with written reasons, if qualifying problems continue.
A state monitor’s power to overrule district decisions would not let the monitor recommend against or interfere with a student’s written special education placement, unless another law allows it.
The education commissioner would need school board approval before appointing an assistant state monitor. This applies when the commissioner wants to add an assistant to a district’s state monitor. The commissioner must explain the need in writing and get a recorded yes vote from a majority of all school board members. The approval rule would take effect immediately if the bill becomes law.
A state monitor would serve a 24-month term. This applies to districts whose financial or audit problems qualify them for a state monitor. The commissioner could reappoint a monitor if the problems that allowed the appointment still qualify. The commissioner must first give the district written reasons. The 12-month period would follow the monitor’s 24-month term. The commissioner would decide on reappointment when that period ends.
A state monitor could not recommend against or interfere with a student’s placement in a written special education plan, unless another law allows it. This covers placements in students’ written special education plans at districts with state monitors. Another law could allow the monitor to take part in the placement decision. This rule would take effect immediately if the bill becomes law.
No hearings or votes scheduled.