Private users would need paid permits for money-making activities at D.C. libraries, with possible waivers when payment causes serious hardship and waiving it serves the public.
Private users’ money-making activities at D.C. libraries would need paid permits; the library’s own activities would be exempt. Waivers could be granted for serious hardship when waiving payment serves the public.
D.C.’s library board would elect one of its members as chair or president every two years and could choose other officers as needed.
The library board could use its written answers in the council’s yearly library performance review as its required annual report to the mayor and council.
Private users would need paid permits from the library board or its chosen representative for money-making activities. These rules would cover D.C. libraries but exempt the library's own money-making activities. The board would approve fees; it or its representative could set permit conditions. The board or its representative could allow waivers only when payment causes serious hardship and waiving it serves the public. These rules would start after mayoral approval or a council veto override and a 30-day review by Congress.
The library board would elect a chair or president every two years. Only a board member could serve as chair or president. The board could also elect other officers it needs. This rule would start after mayoral approval or a council veto override and a 30-day review by Congress.
The library board could use written review answers as its yearly report to the mayor and council. The report would cover library operations during the previous budget year. The answers would have to respond to questions from the council committee responsible for libraries during its annual performance review. This option would take effect after mayoral approval or a council veto override and a 30-day review by Congress.
No hearings or votes scheduled.