Foreign assistance programs could use covered U.S. funds for reproductive health care, including abortion services, training, and equipment, despite other laws or policies.
U.S. foreign aid funds could pay for reproductive health care, including abortion services, training, and equipment, even when another law, rule, or policy says otherwise.
The measure would strike section 104(f)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act. It identifies that section as the Helms amendment and says it restricts foreign aid funding for safe abortion services.
The measure would state that U.S.-funded foreign aid should include safe abortion and integrated reproductive care. It also supports funding and joint work to end unsafe abortion.
Agencies could use covered foreign aid funds for comprehensive reproductive health care. Only funds made available under the part of the Foreign Assistance Act amended here would be covered. The permission would apply despite any other law, regulation, or policy.
The measure would strike section 104(f)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act. The measure identifies the targeted section as the Helms amendment. The findings describe the targeted rule as restricting U.S. foreign assistance funds from paying for safe abortion services.
The United States would adopt this approach as its foreign assistance policy. The policy covers reproductive health care in U.S.-funded foreign assistance programs, including family planning and safe abortion. The policy calls for funding and work with affected governments and service providers on training, supplies, equipment, and access to safe abortion services.
No hearings or votes scheduled.