If Congress provides funding, federal grants and student aid would support educator preparation, workforce planning, and service in high-need schools.
If funded, eligible students could receive tuition help, monthly living aid, and a $25,000 residency stipend for up to four years, in return for service in high-need schools.
If funded, grants would support educator-preparation partnerships and state workforce plans, including paid clinical training, mentoring, pipelines, pay strategies, and staffing models. Funding is authorized at $600 million for 2027 and $1 billion for the next four fiscal years.
The Education Department would have offices for educator workforce policy and education technology, review civil-rights enforcement resources yearly, and report yearly on state educator equity plans.
Federal officials would publish yearly data on teacher training, credentials, vacancies, retention, and student results, often broken out by program, subject, school need, race, and sex.
A national center and grants would study educator preparation, retention, staffing, underserved communities, and classroom technology. Technology funded through the research grants could not replace educators.
The Education Secretary would run a service corps that helps eligible students pay for preparation in specified education fields. Eligible undergraduate and postbaccalaureate students must meet immigration and academic-progress rules and prepare for teaching in a high-need field or working as a school library media specialist. Aid would include up to $15,000 yearly for remaining tuition and fees, monthly payments of $1,500 without dependents or $2,500 with dependents, and $25,000 for a required one-year residency. Recipients would have to begin qualifying work within six months after completing their program and provide one academic year of service for each aid year; part-time work could satisfy an equivalent period. A participant could not receive this scholarship and a TEACH Grant for the same academic year. Unfinished service could turn a proportional share of the aid into a federal loan, with pauses, discharges, and reconsideration available in specified circumstances. Benefits could cover no more than four years; authorized funding rises from $500 million in fiscal 2027 to $1 billion in fiscal 2032.
The Education Secretary would award competitive partnership grants, formula planning grants, and competitive state implementation grants. Partnership grants focus on colleges working with high-need school systems and schools. State grants also cover the Bureau of Indian Education. Partnership projects would have to include preparation demonstrations, technology with privacy and safety safeguards, outside evaluation, and paid school-based training for future educators. Available Title II money would be divided among technical help, Hawkins Centers, partnership grants, and state grants. States would have to assess workforce needs and plan strategies. Money for state planning and implementation grants must add to, rather than replace, nonfederal funding; that restriction is not stated for the partnership grants. Planning grants would last one year, and implementation grants would last three years; the funding authorization covers fiscal 2027 and the next four fiscal years.
Directors appointed by the Education Secretary would lead federal work on the educator workforce and education technology. The workforce office would cover elementary and secondary educators. The technology office would work across elementary, secondary, and college education. The workforce office would coordinate policy, give technical help, administer grants, and evaluate multistate programs. The technology office would support research, digital skills, and responsible use of emerging technology, including artificial intelligence. The proposal would not allow a national teacher licensing system or federal control of private, religious, or home schools, and it would leave collective bargaining rights unchanged. Civil-rights staffing reviews and reports on states’ educator equity plans would occur every year.
The federal education statistics commissioner would collect educator preparation and workforce data and report it to Congress and the public. The information would cover every state-approved educator preparation program, along with state workforce policies and results. A funded state or preparation program that lacks requested data would have to provide a plan to make it available within two years after federal notice. A panel of researchers, practitioners, and data experts would recommend ways to improve the information and reduce reporting work. The data and public report would be yearly; the expert panel would report within one year after it is formed.
The Education Secretary would operate a research center and could fund colleges and nonprofits working with local school systems. Research could cover educator preparation, staffing, retention, tutoring, underserved communities, and tools such as artificial intelligence and virtual classroom simulations. Technology supported through the research grants could help with training or instruction but could not replace classroom educators. No fixed amount is listed for the research grants, so Congress would still have to provide funding.
No hearings or votes scheduled.