New JerseyTowns could not ban state-allowed wildlife activities on private land
If enacted, towns could neither adopt nor enforce rules that block state-allowed wildlife activities on private property or other land they do not own or lease.
What it does
Towns could not pass or enforce rules that directly or indirectly block state-allowed wildlife activities on private property or other land they do not own or lease. This would start if enacted.
Argument forPeople hunting or fishing where state law allows it could face fewer town rules that block those activities on private property.
Argument againstTowns could have less room to address local safety concerns about hunting on private property, because even indirect bans would be barred.
More detail
Towns could not pass or enforce local rules that directly or indirectly block activities allowed under New Jersey's fish and wildlife laws. This covers activities on private property or other land the town does not own or lease, including state-allowed hunting and fishing. The restriction would take effect immediately if the bill becomes law.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed 1st Chamber
- Passed 2nd Chamber
- To Governor
- Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2026
- Sep 17Introduced, Referred to Assembly Agriculture and Natural Resources CommitteeIntroduced
AgricultureGovernment & Ethics