The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would explain why each proposed rule is needed and publish estimates of its costs, benefits, and burdens on consumers and businesses.
The consumer finance agency would publish reasons, costs, benefits, and alternatives for each proposed rule. Unfavorable cost comparisons would require a justification rather than automatically blocking the proposal.
If the agency finds that a proposed rule would raise small businesses' costs, it would consult the Small Business Administration about ways to reduce those costs.
Published rule proposals would explain the agency's assumptions and supporting research, including whether other experts reviewed the studies. When feasible, they would also estimate how likely different outcomes are.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would publish each full rule proposal and its analysis in the Federal Register, the government's official notice journal. Each proposal would explain its need, alternatives, costs, benefits, and who would bear the burden. The agency would explain conflicts or overlap with other federal rules and justify proposals when the required cost or alternatives comparisons are unfavorable.
The agency would consult the Small Business Administration's Office of Advocacy about ways to reduce costs for small businesses. Consultation would be required when the agency determines that a proposed rule would increase small businesses' costs. Consultation would cover direct and indirect costs, without guaranteeing a cost reduction.
The agency would explain its assumptions and describe the studies and data behind its analysis. It would state whether studies had been reviewed by other experts. When feasible, it would use appropriate statistical methods to estimate the likelihood of possible outcomes.
No hearings or votes scheduled.