SB 276 would require courts to award fees in rule challenges
SB 276 proposed requiring courts to award reasonable legal costs to successful challengers when rules or guidance documents violate the constitution, exceed agency authority, or bypass required procedures.
1
What it does
If it took effect, a court would award reasonable legal fees and costs to someone who proves a rule or guidance document is invalid for a listed legal reason. Some cases limit the award to costs tied to the challenge.
Argument forSuccessful challengers could recover reasonable legal costs, which may make it easier to challenge rules that exceed an agency's authority.
Argument againstThe required fee award could raise the stakes for parties defending rules, since a court would award a successful challenger reasonable legal costs.
More detail
A court would award reasonable legal fees and costs to a party whose challenge shows that a rule or guidance document is invalid for a listed legal reason. This applies to court challenges under this section to rules or guidance documents. The court must find that the rule or guidance document violates the constitution, exceeds the agency's legal authority, or was adopted without required procedures. In proceedings listed in subsection (2), the award is limited to costs tied to the challenge, as the court determines. The text says the provision first applies to actions begun on the effective date of the subsection, but gives no calendar date.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
4
More on this bill
Where it stands
Introduced
Passed Senate
Passed House
To Governor
5Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
2026
May 13Failed to pass notwithstanding the objections of the Governor pursuant to Joint Rule 82Latest
May 12Placed on calendar 5-12-2026 pursuant to Joint Rule 82 (2)(a)