The failed proposal would require unbiased descriptions of local bond purposes and let eligible voters challenge that wording in court, holding up the borrowing.
Eligible local voters could sue over inaccurate or biased descriptions of a bond's purpose. The government would have to wait through court review and appeals before issuing the challenged bonds.
When asking voters to approve borrowing through bonds, local governments would have to describe what the money would fund accurately and without bias.
Eligible local voters would be allowed to sue the local government holding a bond election. Only eligible voters in the local government holding the election could bring this lawsuit. The lawsuit must allege that the bond question describes the bond's purpose inaccurately or with bias. The challenged bonds could not be issued until a court enters a final judgment and all appeals finish or the deadline to appeal expires. The proposal named July 1, 2026, as its effective date, but it failed introduction and did not become law.
Local governments would have to describe the purpose of proposed bonds accurately and without bias on the ballot. The requirement would apply to bond questions submitted to eligible voters in the local government proposing the borrowing.
No hearings or votes scheduled.