Wisconsin agencies would pause rules imposing at least $4 million in expected costs over any two-year period unless a law authorizes them or revisions reduce costs.
Agencies would pause rules expected to impose at least $4 million in costs over any two-year period. They could proceed with a law authorizing the rule or revisions bringing costs below that threshold.
Agencies could not split related rules that could be issued as one rule to avoid the cost limit. Courts reviewing a rule would have to invalidate it if it breaks that ban.
State agencies would stop work when a cost study shows a proposed rule meets the $4 million threshold. The threshold covers expected costs businesses, local governments, and individuals would bear to carry out and follow a rule over any two-year period. An agency could proceed if a law authorizes the rule. An agency could revise the rule within its original subject. Its revised cost study and any later independent study would need to show costs below the threshold. The proposal first applies to rules whose scope statements are presented for approval on the provision’s effective date. No calendar date is stated.
Agencies could not split rules to avoid the cost limit. Courts reviewing rules would have to invalidate those issued in violation of that ban. The ban applies to state agencies trying to avoid the cost limit. The ban covers rules with similar requirements or rules on the same subject issued in sequence or depending on one another, when they could be issued as one rule. The proposal first applies to rules whose scope statements are presented for approval on the provision’s effective date. No calendar date is stated.
No hearings or votes scheduled.