Washington law defines digitally made or altered sexual depictions of minors and says prosecutors need not prove a depicted child exists in cases involving them.
The law defines a fabricated depiction as material digitally made or altered to show a minor in sexually explicit conduct. The minor must be identifiable, or the material must be obscene.
In cases involving fabricated depictions, prosecutors do not have to prove that the depicted minor exists. Not knowing that the image was digitally made or altered, or that the minor does not exist, is no defense.
The law defines when digitally made or altered material counts as a fabricated depiction of a minor. The definition covers visual or printed material made or altered using images of another person or computer-generated images, by hand or through an automated process. The material must show a minor in sexually explicit conduct, and the minor must be identifiable from the material or connected information, or the material must be obscene.
In cases involving fabricated depictions, prosecutors need not prove that the depicted minor exists. This rule applies to cases involving dealing in, possessing, sending into Washington, or intentionally viewing covered depictions, and certain offenses involving minors who deal in depictions. A defendant's lack of knowledge that the material was digitally made or altered, or that the depicted minor exists, is not a defense.
No hearings or votes scheduled.