An act relating to protecting the personal information of certain public servants
1
What it does
Plain-language analysis is being updated.
Use the official record and source text while enrichment finishes.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
4
More on this bill
Where it stands
Introduced
Passed 1st Chamber
3Passed 2nd Chamber
4To Governor
5Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
2025
Apr 2Read 1st time & referred to Committee on JudiciaryLatest
Mar 28PassedPassed 1st Chamber
Vote recorded Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 72 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 106, Nays = 38. Result: pass.Lower
Mar 28Rep. Harvey of Castleton withdrew demand for yeas and nays
Mar 28Rep. Harvey of Castleton demanded yeas and nays
Mar 28Read third timeMinor
Mar 28Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 72 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 106, Nays = 38
Mar 28Rep. Harvey of Castleton demanded yeas and nays
Mar 28Rep. Marcotte of Coventry, Carris-Duncan of Whitingham, Duke of Burlington, Graning of Jericho, Olson of Starksboro, Priestley of Bradford, and White of Bethel moved to amend the bill
Mar 28Action Calendar: Action postponed until 3/28/2025
Mar 27Rep. Marcotte of Coventry moved to postpone action until 3/28/2025, which was agreed to
Mar 27Action Calendar: Action postponed until 3/27/2025
Mar 26Action Calendar: Action postponed until 3/27/2025
Mar 25Rep. Marcotte of Coventry moved to postpone action until 3/27/2025, which was agreed to
Mar 25Action Calendar: Action postponed until 3/25/2025
Mar 21Rep. Marcotte of Coventry moved to postpone action until 3/25/2025, which was agreed to
Mar 21Action Calendar: Action postponed until 3/21/2025
Mar 20Rep. Marcotte of Coventry moved to postpone action until 3/21/2025, which was agreed to
Mar 20Action Calendar: Third ReadingMinor
Mar 19Third Reading orderedMinor
Vote recorded Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 72 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 99, Nays = 45. Result: pass.Lower
Mar 19Which was agreed to on a Roll Call Passed -- Needed 72 of 144 to Pass -- Yeas = 99, Nays = 45
Mar 19Report of Committee on Commerce and Economic Development agreed to
Mar 19Rep. Headrick of Burlington demanded yeas and nays
Mar 19Rep. Priestley of Bradford reported for the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development
Mar 19Read second timeMinor
Mar 19Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
Mar 18Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
Mar 12Rep. LaLonde of South Burlington moved that the Committee on Judiciary be relieved of the bill and that the same be committed to the Committee on Commerce and Economic Development, which was agreed to
Feb 25Read first time and referred to the Committee on JudiciaryIntroduced