The proposed rules would require state-funded juvenile detention facilities to accept outside referrals when feasible, and could let the state cut funding for refusals without an allowed reason.
State-funded local detention facilities would have to accept juveniles referred from other localities when placement is feasible, while keeping beds available for local residents.
When a referred juvenile is placed elsewhere, the referring locality would generally cover medical costs, and affected sheriff’s departments would receive compensation and funding priority.
The Department could cut or stop state funding, including money for operations and education, if a facility refuses an outside placement for reasons other than security or urgent operating problems.
The Department could choose up to three detention facilities to provide added support for high-needs or high-risk juveniles, and could give those facilities more funding or resources.
A state-funded local detention facility would have to accept a juvenile referred by another locality. This applies to any locality or commission that operates a juvenile secure detention facility and receives state funds under the cited law. A facility may refuse if security concerns or urgent staffing or other operating problems, including a lack of beds, make placement infeasible. A referred juvenile may not take a bed from a juvenile who lives in the receiving locality.
The referring locality would cover certain costs and responsibilities when its juvenile is placed elsewhere. These rules apply when a locality or commission accepts a juvenile referred from another locality under the placement provision. The referring locality would pay medical expenses unless the localities agree otherwise. If the juvenile injures a facility employee at work, the referring locality would count as the employer for workers’ compensation purposes. Sheriff’s departments affected by the placement, including by extra transportation, would be compensated, and their funding would be prioritized. The receiving locality would set the daily placement cost under the cited law.
The Department of Juvenile Justice could cut or stop a locality’s or commission’s state funding for refusing an outside placement. This applies to a locality or commission that receives state funding for a juvenile secure detention facility. The Department may take this action only when the refusal is for a reason other than security concerns or urgent staffing or other operating problems. The funding that may be cut or stopped includes money for facility operations and education programs.
The Department could designate up to three detention facilities to provide added support and services to high-needs or high-risk juveniles. The provision covers up to three juvenile secure detention facilities and juveniles identified as high-needs or high-risk. The Department may increase funding or provide other resources to the localities or commissions operating designated facilities.
No hearings or votes scheduled.