If reenacted in 2027, the substitute would require nearby nonowners to prove a substantial interest and specific harm before challenging certain zoning decisions in court.
People or groups without an ownership stake would need to show a substantial interest, nearby property, and a specific harm to challenge certain zoning decisions. Changes in property values and some construction effects do not count as a burden.
A person or organization without an ownership interest in the land at issue must meet specific tests to challenge certain zoning decisions in court. These tests cover nonowners challenging a local governing body's zoning action or a board of zoning appeals decision. A person who owns the land directly involved has standing under the stated provisions. The challenger must allege the required facts specifically and prove them with clear and convincing evidence. The challenger must have an immediate, substantial financial interest, own or occupy nearby property, and show a specific harm to a personal or property right or a burden different from the public's. Changes in property values, temporary or intermittent construction effects, and claims that the approved use would harm general safety do not count as a burden. A challenge to a covered governing body decision must be filed within 30 days. A petition challenging a board of zoning appeals decision must be filed within 30 days after the board's final decision.
No hearings or votes scheduled.