When either parent petitions for an initial custody decision, the court would start with a presumption of roughly equal parenting time, subject to evidence and a stated exception.
For an initial physical custody decision, a court would presume roughly equal time with each parent serves the child’s best interest. Evidence about the child could support a different result.
The court would consider the child’s best-interest factors and make written findings, unless both parties waive them or the parents agree on how to resolve the petition.
For an initial physical custody decision, a court would presume that roughly equal time with each parent serves the child’s best interest. This applies to an initial court decision about a minor child’s physical custody between parents. The text describes joint physical custody as an approximately and reasonably equal division of the child’s time, set by the parents’ agreement or a court order. Either parent may petition for the initial custody decision. Evidence based on the child’s best-interest factors could rebut the presumption. The presumption would not apply if the contrary presumption under § 25-4A-22 has been created. The presumption would apply when either parent petitions for an initial physical custody decision, unless the contrary presumption under § 25-4A-22 applies.
The court would consider the child’s best-interest factors and make written findings about the child’s best interest. This concerns a court deciding a petition for an initial physical custody determination. Both parties may waive the findings under § 25-4A-24, or the parents may stipulate to an agreement resolving the petition.
No hearings or votes scheduled.