In abuse and neglect cases, courts and the department would put a child's safety first and courts would explain placement choices in writing.
Courts and the department would weigh a child's safety first, then a stable home, healthy development, and a safe family setting in abuse and neglect matters.
At custody and later case hearings, courts would name the placement they choose and explain why it serves the child's best interests, including why they reject higher-priority options.
Courts and the department would treat the child's best interests as the main standard in abuse and neglect matters. The standard would guide court and department actions under the Abuse and Neglect Act. The standard ranks protection from harm first, followed by a safe, stable home, the child's development, and a safe, nurturing family setting. A placement preference would not create a presumption that reunification with a parent, guardian, or custodian is in the child's best interests. The standard would apply to covered matters and department actions on or after the act's effective date, including cases already pending then.
Courts would put their placement decisions and reasons in writing. The findings would be required at custody, disposition, judicial review, and permanency hearings under the Abuse and Neglect Act. If the court rejects a higher-priority placement, it would explain why. The requirement would apply at covered hearings on or after the act's effective date.
No hearings or votes scheduled.