The failed proposal would keep athlete deal records private and limit sponsor contracts that require in-person ads during required team activities.
Colleges would keep records about current and prospective athletes’ compensation deals from public inspection. A court order or sports rules could require disclosure.
Colleges would not penalize athletes for receiving food, housing, medical care, or insurance from others, or for earning money from name, image, likeness, or reputation deals. That income would not reduce or end their grant-in-aid or stipend.
A sponsor could not offer an athlete a compensation deal that requires in-person advertising during official, required team activities unless the college approves.
Colleges would keep records about athlete compensation deals from public inspection. The rule covers records about current or prospective college athletes’ compensation for use of their name, image, likeness, or athletic reputation. A college could disclose the records when a court orders it or when disclosure is required to follow athletic association or conference rules.
Colleges would not penalize athletes for receiving certain support or earning third-party compensation. The provisions apply to student athletes at post-secondary schools and their grant-in-aid or stipend. The protection covers compensation tied to use of an athlete’s name, image, likeness, or athletic reputation.
A sponsor could not offer a contract requiring an athlete to advertise in person during official team activities without the college’s approval. The rule covers third parties offering student athletes compensation contracts for use of their name, image, likeness, or athletic reputation. The restriction applies to in-person advertising during official, mandatory team activities.
No hearings or votes scheduled.