North Dakota law covers robot use in harassment and stalking cases, including some offensive conduct and unauthorized tracking that causes reasonable fear.
Using a robot for offensive conduct with no legitimate purpose is harassment when the person intends to frighten or harass someone.
Stalking includes certain repeated conduct involving a robot, or unauthorized robot tracking, when it causes reasonable fear, intimidation, or harassment and serves no legitimate purpose.
A person commits harassment by using a robot for offensive conduct with no legitimate purpose and intending to frighten or harass someone. A robot means an artificial object or system that senses, processes, and acts using technology; it includes remotely piloted aircraft. The person must intend to frighten or harass another person.
A person may not intentionally stalk another person, including through certain conduct involving a robot or unauthorized robot tracking. The course of conduct must target a specific person or that person's immediate family. Unauthorized tracking means tracking a person's movements or location without permission. A course of conduct must serve no legitimate purpose and cause a reasonable person to feel fear, intimidation, or harassment. Unauthorized tracking must also meet that standard and serve no legitimate purpose. A course of conduct includes an act with a robot under the person's direct control. Constitutionally protected activity is excluded.
No hearings or votes scheduled.