The proposal would allow saliva testing for suspected impairment among drivers, aircraft operators, hunters, and people operating recreational vehicles.
People reasonably suspected of driving, flying, or hunting under the influence would have to complete impairment testing. Saliva would be a testing option, including for people operating recreational vehicles.
Courts could use saliva test results in impairment cases. For drivers, trace amounts of drugs would need to be considered with other evidence rather than establish impairment alone.
Saliva test results held by hospitals or other medical facilities could be used despite medical confidentiality claims. Courts would need relevant, reliable results and grounds supporting the charged offense.
Officials could use saliva samples in required tests for alcohol or drugs. These provisions cover motor vehicle drivers, aircraft operators, hunters, and people operating or attempting to operate boats, snowmobiles, or ATVs in Maine. For these suspected-impairment tests, probable cause means facts supporting a reasonable belief that the person was operating or hunting under the influence. A drug recognition expert could select a saliva test when the expert has probable cause to suspect drug impairment.
Courts could consider saliva test results as evidence of alcohol or drug use. The evidence provisions cover cases involving drivers, aircraft operators, hunters, and operators of recreational vehicles. For motor vehicle cases, a trace amount of a drug or its breakdown products would not by itself establish impairment. Courts would consider that trace amount with other evidence, and testing would need to follow state reporting rules.
Courts could admit relevant, reliable saliva test results kept by medical facilities despite claims of medical confidentiality. This provision covers criminal or civil cases alleging impaired operation of a motor vehicle, snowmobile, ATV, or boat. The court would need facts supporting a reasonable belief that the operator committed the charged offense. The result would have to be relevant and reliable.
No hearings or votes scheduled.