The proposal would let some inmates receive court-appointed lawyers, and indigent inmates could get electronic court records at no charge when needed for their case.
An inmate serving a felony sentence could get a court-appointed lawyer to challenge a conviction or sentence if the court finds a serious legal or factual issue and the inmate cannot afford counsel.
People under a death sentence could get a lawyer for a conviction or sentence challenge if they meet the stated conditions. A court could choose to appoint a lawyer for an inmate challenging prison conditions.
An indigent inmate could receive electronic court records at no charge when the court finds they are needed to present the case.
A court would appoint a lawyer for an eligible inmate’s felony conviction or sentence challenge. This applies to people serving a felony sentence who file a challenge under K.S.A. 60-1507. The inmate must submit an affidavit saying the challenge is in good faith and that they cannot afford the case or a lawyer. The court must find a substantial legal question or factual issue and determine that the inmate is indigent. The court would review the petition or motion before deciding whether to appoint counsel.
A court would appoint a lawyer for certain challenges by people under a death sentence and could appoint one for prison-conditions challenges. The death-sentence rules apply to people convicted of capital murder. The discretionary rule applies to inmates in the secretary of corrections’ custody who challenge their conditions of confinement under K.S.A. 60-1501. For a death-sentence case, the person must be indigent and accept representation, or be unable to competently decide whether to accept or reject it. The court must deny counsel if the person is competent and not indigent. For a prison-conditions challenge, appointing counsel is left to the court’s discretion.
A court would provide electronic court records to an indigent inmate at no charge when needed to present the case. This applies to an indigent petitioner or movant in a matter before the court. The court must determine that electronic access is necessary to present the inmate’s case and that the inmate is indigent.
No hearings or votes scheduled.