ConnecticutResolution would uphold dismissal of Carol Falcone’s state claim
This version would uphold a state official’s dismissal of Carol Falcone’s claim against Connecticut, but the adopted wording is uncertain.
What it does
This version would uphold the dismissal of Carol Falcone’s claim against Connecticut. Whether lawmakers adopted this wording is unclear.
Argument forConfirming the dismissal could give the state greater certainty by leaving the claims commissioner’s decision in place.
Argument againstUpholding the dismissal could leave Carol Falcone without legislative approval to move her claim forward through this resolution.
More detail
The General Assembly would uphold the claims commissioner’s decision to dismiss Carol Falcone’s claim. The resolution covers Carol Falcone’s claim against Connecticut, identified as claims commissioner file number 26384.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed 1st Chamber
- Passed 2nd Chamber
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2026
- May 5IN CONCURRENCELatest
- Vote recorded House Roll Call Vote 242. Result: pass.Lower
- May 5ADOPTED, HOUSEPassed 2nd Chamber
- Apr 28HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 512
- Vote recorded Senate Roll Call Vote 178. Result: pass.Upper
- Apr 28FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDARMinor
- Apr 28RULES SUSPENDED,TRANS.TO HOUSE
- Apr 28ON CONSENT CALENDAR
- Apr 28ADOPTED, SENATEPassed 1st Chamber
- Apr 14FILE NO. 626
- Apr 14SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 404
- Apr 14FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Minor
- Apr 14RPTD. OUT OF LCO
- Apr 8REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/13/26Minor
- Mar 30FILED WITH LCOMinor
- Mar 30Joint Favorable SubstituteMinor
- Mar 12PUBLIC HEARING 0316
- Mar 4REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON JudiciaryIntroduced
- May 5IN CONCURRENCELatest
Government & Ethics