DelawareLawmakers would urge barring incentives for ICE contractors helping deport people they say lacked fair process
Lawmakers would object to Avelo’s airport incentives and urge the airport authority to bar incentives for businesses whose ICE contracts help deport people they say lacked fair process.
What it does
Lawmakers would urge the airport authority to bar incentives for businesses whose ICE contracts help deport people they say lacked fair process. The request would not ban deals by itself.
Lawmakers would formally object to the airport authority’s continued marketing money and incentives for Avelo. They cite deportations they say lacked fair process.
Argument forIf the airport authority follows the request, its incentive money could avoid supporting businesses whose ICE contracts help deport people lawmakers say lacked fair process.
Argument againstIf the airport authority follows the request, Avelo could lose marketing incentives because lawmakers link its ICE flights to deportations they say lacked fair process.
More detail
Lawmakers would urge the Delaware River and Bay Authority to bar incentive deals. The request covers businesses whose ICE contracts help deport people lawmakers say lacked fair process. The resolution would ask the authority to act. It would not ban the deals by itself.
Lawmakers would formally object to the authority’s continued marketing money and incentives for Avelo. The authority runs Wilmington Airport and reimburses Avelo for promoting its flights there. Lawmakers cite Avelo’s role in deportations they say lacked fair process.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed 1st Chamber
- Passed 2nd Chamber
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2025
- Dec 18Introduced and Laid on Table in SenateIntroduced
ImmigrationTransportationGovernment & Ethics