ConnecticutThis version would uphold dismissal of Kevin Berube’s claim
This version would uphold the Claims Commissioner’s dismissal of Kevin Berube’s claim against Connecticut, though the adopted resolution’s outcome is unclear.
What it does
Kevin Berube’s claim against the state would remain dismissed under this version. The General Assembly would uphold the Claims Commissioner’s decision.
Argument forUpholding the dismissal could give the state greater certainty that the decision on this claim will stand.
Argument againstUpholding the dismissal could leave Kevin Berube without relief through this claim against the state.
More detail
The General Assembly would uphold the Claims Commissioner’s decision to dismiss Kevin Berube’s claim against the state. The resolution concerns Kevin Berube’s claim in Claims Commissioner file number 27029.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed 1st Chamber
- Passed 2nd Chamber
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2026
- May 5IN CONCURRENCELatest
- Vote recorded House Roll Call Vote 241. Result: pass.Lower
- May 5ADOPTED, HOUSEPassed 2nd Chamber
- Apr 28HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 511
- Vote recorded Senate Roll Call Vote 177. Result: pass.Upper
- Apr 28FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDARMinor
- Apr 28RULES SUSPENDED,TRANS.TO HOUSE
- Apr 28ON CONSENT CALENDAR
- Apr 28ADOPTED, SENATEPassed 1st Chamber
- Apr 14FILE NO. 625
- Apr 14SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 403
- Apr 14FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Minor
- Apr 14RPTD. OUT OF LCO
- Apr 8REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/13/26Minor
- Mar 30FILED WITH LCOMinor
- Mar 30Joint Favorable SubstituteMinor
- Mar 12PUBLIC HEARING 0316
- Mar 4REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON JudiciaryIntroduced
- May 5IN CONCURRENCELatest
Government & Ethics