CaliforniaConservatorships.
What it does
Existing law, the Guardianship-Conservatorship Law, generally establishes the standards and procedures for the appointment and termination of an appointment for a guardian or conservator of a person, an estate, or both. Existing law authorizes a conservator to authorize the placement of a conservatee in a secured perimeter residential care facility for the elderly upon a court making specific findings.
More detail
This bill would also authorize a conservator to authorize the placement of a conservatee in a residential facility, an intermediate care facility, or a skilled nursing facility, as defined, that has a secured perimeter, a delayed egress device, or both a secured perimeter and a delayed egress device, as specified. The bill would require court approval for a subsequent placement of a conservatee in a different facility if specific regulations have not been promulgated for the type of facility to which the conservator is seeking to move the conservatee. The bill would require the State Department of Social Services and the State Department of Public Health to update their regulations related to these provisions, including, among other things, to create regulations to protect the rights, health, and safety of residents, by January 1, 2027, and would authorize those departments to promulgate emergency regulations prior to that date.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- To Governor
- Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2025
- Aug 29In committee: Held under submission.Latest
- Aug 18In committee: Referred to suspense file.Minor
- Vote recorded Placed on suspense file. Result: pass.Upper
- Jul 8From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Minor
- Jul 7Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.Minor
- Vote recorded Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Upper
- Jul 3Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.Major
- Jul 2From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 1).Major
- Jul 1
- Vote recorded Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Rules]. Result: pass.Upper
- May 20From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.Major
- May 7Referred to Com. on JUD.Minor
- Apr 21In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.Minor
- Vote recorded AB 1105 Quirk-Silva Consent Calendar Second Day. Result: pass.Lower
- Apr 21Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1176.)Passed Assembly
- Apr 9Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.Minor
- Apr 8From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 8).Minor
- Vote recorded Do pass. To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Lower
- Apr 3Re-referred to Com. on JUD.Minor
- Apr 2From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.Major
- Mar 18In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
- Mar 10Referred to Com. on JUD.Minor
- Feb 21From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
- Feb 20Read first time. To print.Introduced