People harmed by intentional sharing or threatened sharing of private intimate images may bring a civil case when the accused knew or recklessly ignored key facts.
People harmed by intentional sharing or threatened sharing of a private intimate image may bring a civil case if the accused knew, or recklessly ignored, key facts about consent, privacy, and identity.
Creating an intimate image or sharing it consensually before does not, by itself, prove a person agreed to its later disclosure or gave up privacy.
If multiple defendants are found liable, each may be held responsible for the full amount owed under this law.
An identifiable person harmed by an intentional disclosure or threatened disclosure may bring a civil case. This covers identifiable people harmed by disclosure or threatened disclosure of a private intimate image, including victims of sexual extortion or aggravated sexual extortion. The person accused must have known, or recklessly disregarded, that the depicted person did not consent, the image was private, and the person was identifiable. An exception in §55-20-4 applies. The law took effect June 12, 2026, 90 days after passage.
Agreeing to create an intimate image, or sharing it consensually before, does not by itself prove agreement to a later disclosure or loss of privacy. This applies in a civil case about disclosure of an intimate image. These facts alone do not prove consent to the disclosure or that the person lacked a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Each defendant found liable under this law is responsible for the full liability together with any other liable defendants. This covers each person found liable under this article and any other defendant found liable under it. This rule applies despite the general rule referenced in §55-7-13c.
No hearings or votes scheduled.