Courts may keep youthful-offender cases open after age 22
Beginning July 1, 2026, courts handling youthful-offender probation violations may keep cases open after age 22 and may require missed-hearing appearances.
1
What it does
When a youthful offender violates probation, the court may keep the case open past the youth’s 22nd birthday until it resolves the violation. The court must consider listed factors before keeping the case or sending it to the Criminal Division.
If a youthful offender does not appear at the hearing, the court may order an officer to pick up the youth and bring the youth to court.
Victims may attend a youthful-offender consideration hearing and be heard by the court.
Argument forKeeping jurisdiction open may let courts resolve probation violations even after a youth turns 22, instead of leaving the motion unresolved.
Argument againstA pickup order may bring a youth to court involuntarily after missing a hearing, adding a direct enforcement step for the youth.
More detail
A court may keep jurisdiction over a youthful offender after the youth turns 22 while it resolves a probation-violation motion. This applies when a youthful offender violates probation and a probation-violation motion is pending. The court must consider listed factors when deciding whether to keep the case or send the youth to the Criminal Division. The extended jurisdiction lasts until the probation-violation motion is resolved, and the act takes effect July 1, 2026.
A court may order an officer to pick up a youthful offender and bring the youth to court after the youth fails to appear. This applies to a youthful offender who fails to appear at a probation-violation hearing. This applies at the hearing connected to the probation violation, beginning July 1, 2026.
A victim may attend and speak at a youthful-offender consideration hearing. This covers the victim connected to the youthful-offender case. The participation applies at the youthful-offender consideration hearing beginning July 1, 2026.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
4
More on this bill
Where it stands
Introduced
Passed 1st Chamber
Passed 2nd Chamber
To Governor
Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
2026
May 29House message: Governor approved bill on June 16, 2026Latest
May 29Delivered to Governor on June 10, 2026To Governor
May 28House message: House adopted Conference Committee report
May 26Committee of Conference report adopted (House bill)Major
May 26Rules suspended and taken up for immediate consideration as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
May 26Notice Calendar: Report of Committee of Conference
May 22Senate Message: Report of Committee of Conference adopted
May 22Rules suspended & messaged to House forthwith, on motion of Senator Baruth
May 22Committee of Conference report adopted
May 22Committee of Conference report submitted by Senator Hashim for Committee, text
May 22Committee of Conference report
May 22Entered on Notice Calendar
May 20Senate Message: Committee of Conference members appointed
May 20Committee of Conference appointed: Senators Hashim, Vyhovsky, and Mattos
May 20House message: House refused to concur in Senate proposal of amendment & requested Conference Committee; House Conference Committee members appointedMinor
May 19Rules suspended and bill messaged forthwith to the Senate as moved by Rep. McCoy of Poultney
May 19Speaker appointed Reps. Dolan of Essex Junction, Goodnow of Brattleboro, and Oliver of Sheldon as members of the Committee of Conference on the part of the House
May 19Senate proposal of amendment not concurred in and Committee of Conference requested upon motion of Rep. Goodnow of BrattleboroMinor
May 19Action Calendar: Senate Proposal of AmendmentMinor
May 18Notice Calendar: Senate Proposal of AmendmentMinor
May 15Senate Message: Passed in concurrence with proposal of amendmentMinor
May 14Read 3rd time & passed in concurrence with proposal of amendmentPassed 2nd Chamber
May 14New Business/Third ReadingMinor
May 133rd reading ordered
May 13Proposal of amendment by Committee on Judiciary agreed toMinor
May 13Read 2nd time, reported favorably with proposal of amendment by Senator Mattos for Committee on JudiciaryMinor
May 13Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on JudiciaryMinor
May 13New Business/Second ReadingMinor
May 12Favorable report with proposal of amendment by Committee on JudiciaryMinor
May 12Second ReadingMinor
May 12Entered on Notice Calendar
Mar 25Read 1st time & referred to Committee on JudiciaryMinor
Mar 20Read third time and passedPassed 1st Chamber
Vote recorded Which was disagreed to on a Roll Call Failed -- Needed 68 of 136 to Pass -- Yeas = 53, Nays = 83. Result: fail.Lower
Vote recorded Which was disagreed to on a Roll Call Failed -- Needed 69 of 137 to Pass -- Yeas = 52, Nays = 85. Result: fail.Lower
Mar 20Which was disagreed to on a Roll Call Failed -- Needed 69 of 137 to Pass -- Yeas = 52, Nays = 85
Mar 20Rep. Maguire of Rutland City demanded yeas and nays
Mar 20Rep. Maguire of Rutland City moved to amend the bill
Mar 20Which was disagreed to on a Roll Call Failed -- Needed 68 of 136 to Pass -- Yeas = 53, Nays = 83
Mar 20Rep. Higley of Lowell demanded yeas and nays
Mar 20Rep. Boutin of Barre City moved to amend the bill
Mar 20Action Calendar: Action postponed until March 20, 2026
Mar 19Rep. Goodnow of Brattleboro moved to postpone action until March 20, 2026, which was agreed to
Mar 19Action Calendar: Third ReadingMinor
Mar 18Third Reading orderedMinor
Mar 18Report of Committee on Judiciary agreed to
Mar 18Rep. Goodnow of Brattleboro reported for the Committee on Judiciary
Mar 18Read second timeMinor
Mar 18Action Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
Mar 17Notice Calendar: Favorable with Amendment
Jan 13Read first time and referred to the Committee on JudiciaryIntroduced