Dentists could give moderate sedation to children under 13 without a second anesthesia provider if they meet training rules and explain the hospital option.
For patients under 13, moderate sedation would not require a second anesthesia provider. Dentists would need pediatric emergency and airway training and would have to explain the hospital option.
For general anesthesia or deep sedation in children under 13, a second provider would normally monitor care. The board would exempt dentists with certain specialty credentials; pediatric training and consent rules would still apply.
A dentist could give moderate sedation without another anesthesia provider. This applies to dental patients under 13. The board's qualifications would include accredited residency training or an equivalent, plus a way for established dentists to show their qualifications. Dentists would need pediatric life support and airway training. They would have to tell families that a hospital could use extra anesthesia staff, possibly at a higher cost. The board could not limit moderate sedation to one way of giving it. This provision would take effect 60 days after passage.
The dental board would exempt certain dentists from the separate anesthesia provider requirement. This applies when a child under 13 receives general anesthesia or deep sedation during dental care. The dentist must be board eligible or board certified in dental anesthesiology or oral and maxillofacial surgery. Any board limits on the exemption must follow professional standards. A limit that unduly raises costs or reduces access would need strong evidence that it prevents real public harm. Dentists would still need pediatric life support and airway training and would have to explain the hospital option and its possible higher cost. This provision would take effect 60 days after passage.
No hearings or votes scheduled.