Local governments would have been unable to ban people from using equipment with fuel-burning engines for grounds care or snow and ice removal on any property.
Local governments could not have banned a person from using grounds care or snow and ice removal equipment with fuel-burning engines on any property within a municipality.
Local leaders could have barred their municipality from buying snow or ice removal equipment with fuel-burning engines, but only if a majority of its citizens voted for the ban.
A local governing body would have been barred from prohibiting a person from operating equipment with a fuel-burning engine. The rule would have covered equipment for grounds care or snow and ice removal on any property within a municipality. If passed, the rule would have taken effect 60 days after passage.
A local governing body could have barred its municipality from buying snow or ice removal equipment with fuel-burning engines. The rule would have applied to the municipality's own equipment purchases. A majority of the municipality's citizens would have had to vote for the purchase ban. If passed, the rule would have taken effect 60 days after passage.
No hearings or votes scheduled.