The measure died on the table; it proposed protecting registered patients’ state firearm rights, limiting local help with federal enforcement, and allowing the attorney general to defend certain cases.
People lawfully registered in New Hampshire’s therapeutic cannabis program would not be denied firearm rights under state law because they participate.
State and local officials would not be allowed to help enforce federal firearm possession bans against qualifying patients who follow New Hampshire’s therapeutic cannabis rules.
The attorney general could step into or help defend a qualifying patient’s federal firearm case if the charge is based only on lawful participation in the state program.
New Hampshire law would protect qualifying people from being denied firearm rights because of their participation in the therapeutic cannabis program. It covers qualifying patients, caregivers, and other people lawfully registered under the therapeutic cannabis chapter, and applies to buying, possessing, carrying, or transferring firearms and ammunition. This protection applies under New Hampshire law. The bill proposed taking effect 60 days after passage, but it died on the table before passage.
State and local agencies, employees, and law enforcement officers would be barred from spending resources on, cooperating with, or helping enforce certain federal firearm prohibitions. It covers state and local agencies, employees, and law enforcement officers. The restriction applies to federal prohibitions against firearm possession by qualifying patients who comply with the state program. The bill proposed taking effect 60 days after passage, but it died on the table before passage.
The attorney general would have authority to join or appear in a case, or provide a defense. This authority concerns qualifying patients facing the specified federal prosecution. The case must involve a qualifying patient facing federal prosecution under 18 U.S.C. section 922(g)(3) solely because of lawful participation in the state program. The bill proposed taking effect 60 days after passage, but it died on the table before passage.
No hearings or votes scheduled.