If enacted, state and local public employees and officers could not sign certain data-center secrecy agreements and could face fines of up to $1,000.
Public employees and officers would not be allowed to sign secrecy agreements tied to large data centers. A violation could bring a civil fine of up to $1,000.
The ban would not require people to reveal legally privileged or otherwise protected information. It also would not cover written settlements of actual or threatened lawsuits.
Public employees and public officers would be barred from entering certain data-center nondisclosure agreements and could face a civil fine of up to $1,000. The rule covers state and local employees, contractors, elected or appointed officers, and many state and local public bodies. It excludes the judiciary and certain county clerk functions. The agreement must relate to a data-center project and restrict sharing information based on confidentiality or trade-secret claims. The county prosecutor where the violation occurred or the attorney general could sue to collect the fine. The rule would apply to agreements entered into, changed, extended, or renewed on or after the act's effective date.
The ban would not cover certain protected information or written agreements settling actual or threatened lawsuits. The exceptions cover information protected by legal privilege, information whose disclosure is barred by law, and written litigation settlements. The exceptions do not require disclosure of the protected information. The agreement must be a written settlement of actual or threatened litigation to qualify for the settlement exception. These exceptions would apply when the act governs an agreement entered into, amended, extended, or renewed on or after the effective date.
No hearings or votes scheduled.