School employees must report threats, and schools may request free security reviews when the state has enough funding and staff.
School employees who learn of a threat of violence or terrorism must immediately tell local law enforcement and, unless they are the administrator, the school administrator.
Public, charter, and nonpublic schools may request a free security review when funding and staff are available. The report suggests ways to address risks, but schools do not have to make those changes.
A school that substantially follows a security review's advice gets a presumption that it used reasonable care. The school may use relevant review findings or actions taken in response as a defense in a civil case.
Schools seeking grants to carry out a security review's findings or suggested options receive funding priority, but that priority does not guarantee an award.
School employees must immediately report threats to local law enforcement and, unless they are the administrator, to the school administrator. It covers full-time and part-time administrators, teachers, counselors, bus operators, and other school employees. The duty applies when an employee learns of a threat through spoken, written, or electronic communication. Employees must report immediately after learning of the threat.
The Louisiana Fusion Center may conduct a physical security review when a school requests one and must provide a written report with findings and suggested options. Public elementary and secondary schools, charter schools, and nonpublic schools may request a review. A public school may receive no more than one review every three years. Reviews are conducted only as funds, staff, and other resources allow. They are free to the school, district, and governing authority. Schools do not have to carry out the suggested options. The findings are advisory and do not create a legal duty or standard of care. A public school may receive no more than one review every three years; the fusion center schedules reviews as resources allow.
Schools that substantially follow a review's findings or options receive a rebuttable presumption that the property was not unreasonably dangerous and that the school used reasonable care. This applies in civil cases involving a school, school board, or school governing authority. Only a school, school board, or governing authority may offer the review as a defense in a civil case. For a claim about an unsafe condition on school property, it may offer only the relevant part of the review. The presumption may be challenged. Actions taken in response to a review may also be used as a defense.
Grant funding is prioritized for schools seeking money to carry out findings or options in a security review report. Eligible schools include public elementary and secondary schools and nonpublic schools approved by the State Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. Schools may apply for grants, but priority does not guarantee an award.
No hearings or votes scheduled.