Participants in certain in-person conversations would have to be told before someone intentionally uses wearable eyeglasses to record or transcribe them.
Participants would have to notify everyone in certain private-feeling in-person conversations before intentionally using wearable eyeglasses to record or transcribe them, with broad exceptions.
A person found responsible could owe the affected individual damages, court costs, and attorney fees, but the claimant would have to prove actual harm from intentional unlawful recording and sharing.
A participant would have to specifically notify every other participant before intentionally using wearable eyeglasses to video, record, or transcribe a covered conversation. The rule covers an in-person oral conversation directed to specific people when a reasonable person would not expect it to be recorded or transcribed. The rule does not cover public or semi-public meetings, law enforcement activity, emergencies, or first responder activity. It does not cover recordings made to preserve evidence for civil, administrative, or criminal matters, or recordings made by a participant in the participant's home, workplace, or vehicle. It does not cover recordings made by someone who is not a participant or unintended background capture in public places. Recording a law enforcement officer in a public place or another place where the recorder may legally be is exempt, unless the recorder physically interferes with or materially obstructs lawful police activity.
A person found to violate the chapter could be ordered to pay the affected individual damages, court costs, and reasonable attorney fees. The remedy applies to a person who violates the chapter's rules about recording or transcribing covered direct conversations. A claimant must show actual harm resulting from intentional unlawful videoing or recording and dissemination. The Electronic Surveillance Act is not changed, limited, expanded, or replaced by this chapter.
No hearings or votes scheduled.