IowaIowa judges must explain decisions on certain child placements
Iowa judges must explain why certain placements are not in a child’s best interests, and find that a long-term foster placement is in the child’s best interests.
What it does
Before ordering placement in certain categories, a judge must find that living with an adult relative is not in the child’s best interests and explain why.
If a child has been with a licensed foster caregiver for at least nine months before the dispositional hearing, a judge must find that the placement is in the child’s best interests before ordering placement in certain categories.
Argument forRequiring judges to explain why a relative placement is not in a child’s best interests could keep relatives under consideration.
Argument againstThe required findings could add steps to court decisions about where children live, including after a child has stayed with a foster caregiver for nine months.
More detail
A judge must find that placement with an adult relative is not in the child’s best interests and give reasons before ordering certain placements. This applies to placements in the categories listed in Iowa Code section 232.102(1)(a)(2), (3), (4), and (5).
A judge must find that placement with the licensed foster caregiver is in the child’s best interests and give reasons before ordering certain placements. This applies when, at the dispositional hearing, the child has been placed with a person licensed to provide foster care for at least nine months immediately before that hearing. It covers the categories listed in Iowa Code section 232.102(1)(a)(1), (2), and (3). The nine-month period must immediately precede the dispositional hearing.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed 1st Chamber
- Passed 2nd Chamber
- To Governor
- Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2026
- May 15Signed by Governor Kim Reynolds.Became Law
- May 13Reported correctly enrolled, signed by Speaker and President, and sent to Governor.To Governor
- May 2Message from House.
- Vote recorded Shall the House concur in the Senate amendment H-8459? Result: pass.Lower
- Vote recorded Shall the bill pass? Result: pass.Lower
- May 2Immediate message.
- May 2Explanation of vote.
- May 2Passed House, yeas 85, nays 0.Major
- May 2Amendment H-8459, yeas 57, nays 28, adopted.
- May 1NOBA: Senate Floor
- Vote recorded Shall the bill pass? Result: pass.Upper
- May 1Senate amendment H-8459 filed.Minor
- May 1Message from Senate.
- May 1Immediate message.
- May 1Explanation of vote.
- May 1Passed Senate, yeas 43, nays 0.Passed 2nd Chamber
- May 1Amendment S-5004 adopted.Major
- Mar 26Placed on calendar under unfinished business.
- Feb 4Placed on calendar.
- Feb 4Amendment S-5004 filed.Minor
- Feb 4Committee report, recommending amendment and passage.Minor
- Jan 26Subcommittee recommends amendment and passage.
- Jan 22Subcommittee Meeting: 01/26/2026 11:30AM Room 217 Conference Room.
- Jan 21Subcommittee: Guth, Costello, and Zimmer.
- 2025
- Apr 23Read first time, referred to Health and Human Services.Minor
- Apr 23Message from House.
- Apr 22NOBA: House Floor
- Vote recorded Shall the bill pass? Result: pass.Lower
- Apr 22Immediate message.
- Apr 22Passed House, yeas 92, nays 0.Passed 1st Chamber
- Apr 21NOBA: House Full Approps
- Apr 10Introduced, placed on Appropriations calendar.Introduced
Criminal Justice