Illinois law covers digital harassment and firearm surrender in protection orders
Illinois law includes certain digital conduct in harassment rules and lets courts order firearm surrender or transfer phone service when stated conditions are met.
1
What it does
In domestic violence cases, certain digital conduct, including repeated tracking and sharing private sexual images, is presumed to cause distress when courts decide whether it counts as harassment.
For qualifying protection orders, courts must bar a respondent found to pose a credible threat from possessing firearms and order surrender; a search warrant requires additional court findings.
A petitioner may ask the court to transfer a phone number used by them or a child in their custody, but takes on the related service and device costs.
Argument forPeople seeking protection may find it easier to show harassment when repeated digital tracking or sharing private sexual images causes them distress.
Argument againstA respondent who meets the order’s threat criteria could lose access to firearms for the order’s duration, even when no search warrant is issued.
More detail
Courts treat certain listed conduct as presumed to cause emotional distress when deciding whether conduct meets the harassment definition. The definition applies in domestic violence cases and includes repeated electronic tracking, deceptive impersonation using generated or altered content, sharing private sexual images, and publishing the petitioner's personal information. Harassment also requires knowing conduct that is unreasonable in the circumstances, would cause a reasonable person emotional distress, and does cause distress to the petitioner. The presumption can be rebutted with evidence showing it is more likely than not that the conduct did not cause emotional distress.
A court must bar firearm possession and order surrender when a protection order meets the listed criteria; it must issue a search warrant only when additional findings support one. These rules concern respondents subject to emergency, interim, or plenary protection orders and firearms or parts that could be assembled into a working firearm. The possession ban applies when the order followed a hearing with actual notice and a chance to participate, or emergency-order requirements were met, and the order includes the required restraints and a finding that the respondent poses a credible threat. A warrant requires sworn testimony and findings of a credible threat and probable cause that firearms are at the place to be searched. An ex parte warrant also requires a finding that the petitioner is likely to be injured if the respondent receives advance notice. The possession ban lasts for the protection order. Firearms at the place of service must be surrendered then; other firearms must be surrendered within 24 hours.
A court may order a wireless phone provider to transfer a phone number and its billing responsibility to the petitioner. A petitioner may seek a number used by the petitioner or a minor child in the petitioner's custody. The petitioner must request the transfer, and the court must issue an order. The petitioner takes on the service and device costs. A provider may decline the transfer if the account is closed or a technical or service limit prevents it. The provider must notify the petitioner within 72 hours if it cannot make the transfer for a listed reason.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.