Bill would let POST suspend or revoke officers for intentional theft
The bill would let California’s peace officer standards commission suspend or revoke an officer’s certification for intentional theft committed under official authority.
1
What it does
POST could suspend or revoke an officer’s certification for theft committed under official authority, if the officer meant to permanently keep the property. Errors or oversight do not qualify.
Argument forThe commission could suspend or revoke an officer’s certification for intentional theft under official authority, helping protect property owners from abuse of that power.
Argument againstOfficers could lose their certification for intentional theft based on the commission’s decision, even when the theft did not involve force.
More detail
POST could suspend or revoke a peace officer’s certification for theft committed under color of authority. This applies to peace officers who commit theft while using their official authority. The officer must have intended to permanently deprive the owner of the property. The conduct cannot result from mere negligence, administrative oversight, or a good-faith error in handling evidence.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Sep 10Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.To Governor
Aug 31
Vote recorded AB 2337 Lackey Concurrence in Senate Amendments. Result: pass.Lower
Aug 30Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6937.).Major
Vote recorded 3rd Reading AB2337 Lackey By Padilla. Result: pass.Upper
Aug 30In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
Aug 30Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0.).Passed Senate
Aug 30Ordered to special consent calendar.
Aug 26Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
Aug 25Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.Major
Aug 13Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
Vote recorded Do pass. Result: pass.Upper
Aug 13From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (August 13).Minor
Aug 3In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.Minor
Vote recorded Placed on suspense file. Result: pass.Upper
Jun 29From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.Major
Jun 24From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Minor
Jun 23
Vote recorded Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with the recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Upper
Jun 10Referred to Com. on PUB. S.Minor
Jun 1In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.Minor
May 28Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5528.)Passed Assembly
Vote recorded AB 2337 Lackey Assembly Third Reading. Result: pass.Lower
May 18Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
May 14From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).Minor
Vote recorded Do pass. Result: pass.Lower
May 6In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.Minor
Apr 27Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Minor
Apr 23Read second time and amended.Major
Apr 22From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 21).Major
Apr 21
Vote recorded Do pass as amended, and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Lower
Apr 9In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Mar 9Referred to Com. on PUB. S.Minor
Feb 20From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
Feb 19Read first time. To print.Introduced
Criminal JusticeGovernment & EthicsCivil Rights & Voting