California would read existing sex or gender discrimination bans to cover listed real or assumed traits and actions, including gender identity and pregnancy-related care choices.
State bans on sex or gender discrimination would use a definition covering harassment tied to real or assumed traits and actions, including gender identity and pregnancy-related care choices.
In existing rules for business services, jobs, and housing, “sex” would include the bill's listed traits and actions, such as gender identity and pregnancy-related care choices.
If this bill and AB 1940 both take effect on or before January 1, 2027, and AB 1940 changes state job and housing definitions, the list would also include menopause stages and related conditions.
California would require existing sex or gender discrimination bans to use the bill's definition of sex discrimination. This applies to California laws that already ban discrimination based on sex, gender, or similar grounds. Harassment counts as discrimination under this definition. If definitions conflict, the rule giving people greater protection controls. The bill says it reflects existing protections and is meant to leave rights and duties as they are.
The bill would add its listed traits and actions to the meaning of “sex” in two existing discrimination laws. One law covers equal service at businesses. The other covers discrimination in jobs and housing.
The bill would include menopause stages and related medical conditions in its sex discrimination definition if the AB 1940 conditions are met. This covers discrimination based on a person's real or assumed menopause stage or related medical condition. AB 1940 must become law and amend the section defining terms for state job and housing discrimination rules. Both this bill and AB 1940 must take effect on or before January 1, 2027, for the added wording to apply.
No hearings or votes scheduled.