California gas utilities would report yearly on local gas delivery system replacement and upgrade costs, while regulators would consider how to spread those costs over time.
Gas utilities would file yearly reports on spending and progress for local gas delivery system replacements and upgrades. They would flag significant forecast changes and risks for remaining customers.
Regulators would consider a plan to spread local gas delivery system costs over time as gas use changes, aiming to limit future customers' costs. If developed, they could use it to review replacement and upgrade costs.
Each gas utility would report yearly on local gas delivery system replacement and upgrade spending. Reports would cover spending during each utility's major rate review cycle. Reports would list planned costs, project status, remaining costs, significant forecast changes, risks for remaining customers, and alternatives to pipelines considered or used. Project status and alternatives would cover the time since the utility's last major rate decision.
State regulators would consider a plan for spreading local gas delivery system costs over time. It would cover local gas delivery equipment and its replacement and upgrade projects. The plan would reflect reasonably expected changes in gas use and aim to limit future customers' costs for equipment no longer needed. If developed, regulators could use it to review how utilities recover replacement and upgrade costs. Regulators would consider it in their long-term gas planning case or a later case that replaces it.
No hearings or votes scheduled.