CaliforniaSchool districts must post transfer policies and review joint applications
Starting January 1, 2027, districts entering transfer agreements must post clear request policies, and families may ask both districts to review a transfer at once.
What it does
For agreements entered on or after January 1, 2027, school boards must post transfer policies covering deadlines, approval rules, appeals, and when a permit may be canceled. The rules also set decision deadlines and limited extensions.
School districts entering a new interdistrict agreement must include the required transfer policy provisions in that agreement.
When districts have an agreement, families may send a transfer request to both at once, and the proposed district must start reviewing it when it arrives.
Argument forFamilies could start the review sooner by sending a transfer request to both districts at once, even while awaiting the home district’s response.
Argument againstFamilies could wait longer for a decision when an application is incomplete or an individualized education program meeting is pending.
More detail
School boards must adopt and post a policy explaining how families can request an interdistrict transfer. This applies to school districts that have an interdistrict attendance agreement. The policy must cover request timelines, approval criteria, appeals, and the conditions for canceling an existing permit. For current-year requests, districts generally must give a final decision within 30 days. If a request is incomplete, the district must identify missing information within 30 days and may extend review by up to 30 more days with timely written notice. A pending or scheduled individualized education program meeting also allows an extension of up to 30 days with timely written notice. For requests for a future school year, districts must decide as soon as possible and no later than 14 days after instruction begins. The new agreement requirements apply to agreements entered on or after January 1, 2027. Conflicting rules in older agreements continue until those agreements expire or are renewed.
New interdistrict agreements must include the required transfer policy provisions. This applies to agreements between school districts for students to attend school outside their district of residence. The required provisions are those listed in the district’s transfer policy, including procedures and timelines for requests. This applies to agreements entered on or after January 1, 2027. Conflicting terms in agreements made earlier continue until the agreement expires or is renewed.
A parent or guardian may send a transfer request to both districts at the same time, and the receiving district must start its review when it gets the request. This applies when the student’s home district and proposed district have an interdistrict attendance agreement. The receiving district must start reviewing the request regardless of whether the district where the student lives has responded. The proposed district begins review upon receiving the request; the home district’s response does not have to come first.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed Senate
- Passed Assembly
- To Governor
- Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2026
- Sep 27Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 675, Statutes of 2026.Latest
- Sep 27Approved by the Governor Gavin Newsom.Became Law
- Aug 21Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.To Governor
- Aug 17Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 5485.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.Major
- Vote recorded Unfinished Business SB1082 Niello Concurrence. Result: pass.Upper
- Aug 6In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
- Vote recorded SB 1082 Niello Consent Calendar Second Day. Result: pass.Lower
- Aug 6Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 6086.) Ordered to the Senate.Passed Assembly
- Aug 3Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.Minor
- Jul 2Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.Major
- Jul 2From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 1).Major
- Jul 1
- Vote recorded Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Lower
- Jun 4Referred to Com. on ED.Minor
- May 27In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.Minor
- Vote recorded 3rd Reading. Result: pass.Upper
- May 27Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 4486.) Ordered to the Assembly.Passed Senate
- May 14Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
- Vote recorded Do pass. Result: pass.Upper
- May 14From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4264.) (May 14).Minor
- May 8Set for hearing May 14.
- May 4May 4 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
- Vote recorded Placed on suspense file. Result: pass.Upper
- Apr 24Set for hearing May 4.
- Apr 22Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Major
- Apr 21From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3899.) (April 15).Major
- Apr 15
- Vote recorded Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]. Result: pass.Upper
- Apr 2Set for hearing April 15.
- Mar 31April 8 hearing postponed by committee.
- Mar 23Set for hearing April 8.
- Mar 19From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.Major
- Feb 26Referred to Coms. on ED. and APPR.Minor
- Feb 17From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.
- Feb 13Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.Introduced
EducationTransportationImmigration