Refinery task force would study worker retention and safety
If enacted, California would create a temporary task force to study keeping refinery workers employed and operating refineries safely before closure or long-term idling.
1
What it does
A new state task force would bring together refinery workers, employers, unions, community groups, and safety experts to study staffing during refinery closures or long-term shutdowns.
By June 1, 2029, the task force would publish possible ways to retain refinery workers, operate safely with fewer staff, and help oil and gas workers shift to matching careers.
Argument forStudying retention payments, training, and safer staffing could help workers remain through refinery closures and reduce risks from understaffing.
Argument againstBecause the recommendations would not be binding and expenses depend on future funding, the task force may not lead to changes for workers or employers.
More detail
California would create the Refinery Safe Staffing Task Force. The task force would include refinery worker unions, building-trades unions, refinery employers, worker and community organizations, and public safety experts. Members would serve without pay. Members could receive actual and necessary expenses only if money is set aside for that purpose. The task force could consult Department of Industrial Relations process-safety staff. All members would be appointed and begin serving by January 1, 2028. The chapter would become inoperative July 1, 2029, and be repealed January 1, 2030.
The task force would present a report to the Legislature and post it online for the public. The report would address refineries facing closure or long-term idling and oil and gas workers who may need to move into related fields. The report would study possible tools such as longer severance, paid training, job-placement help, transfers, and financial or logistical assistance. It would also study ways to keep refineries safe when staffing is short. The task force's recommendations could be used in union negotiations but would not be binding. The report would be due by June 1, 2029, before the chapter becomes inoperative July 1, 2029.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Sep 14Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:30 p.m.To Governor
Aug 31Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 18. Page 6962.).Major
Vote recorded AB 605 Muratsuchi Concurrence in Senate Amendments. Result: pass.Lower
Aug 30From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (August 30).Minor
Vote recorded With recommendation: That Senate amendments be concurred in. Result: pass.Lower
Aug 30Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 6844.)
Aug 30Re-referred to Com. on L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.Minor
Aug 28In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
Vote recorded 3rd Reading AB605 Muratsuchi By Blakespear. Result: pass.Upper
Aug 28Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 11.).Passed Senate
Aug 24Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
Aug 21Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.Major
Aug 17Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
Aug 13Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.Major
Vote recorded Do pass as amended. Result: pass.Upper
Aug 13From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 13).Major
Aug 3In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.Minor
Vote recorded Placed on suspense file. Result: pass.Upper
Jul 2Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Major
Jul 2From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (July 1).Major
Jul 1
Vote recorded Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations]. Result: pass.Upper
Jun 24From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.Minor
Vote recorded Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Environmental Quality]. Result: pass.Upper
Jun 15Re-referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and E.Q.Minor
Jun 11Re-referred to Com. on RLS.Minor
Jun 11Withdrawn from committee.Major
Jun 10From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.Major
2025
Jul 2In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
Jun 18Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and TRANS.Minor
Jun 5In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.Minor
Jun 4Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2055.)Passed Assembly
Vote recorded AB 605 Muratsuchi Assembly Third Reading. Result: pass.Lower
May 27Read second time. Ordered to third reading.Minor
May 23From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).Minor
Vote recorded Do pass. Result: pass.Lower
May 7In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.Minor
Apr 29From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Minor
Apr 28
Vote recorded Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Lower
Apr 22From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.Minor
Apr 21Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.Minor
Vote recorded Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Natural Resources]. Result: pass.Lower
Apr 10From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended.Major
Mar 3Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and NAT. RES.Minor
Feb 14From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.