United StatesExpands interagency role in export control rulemaking and China review
Tightening and speeding export-control decisions affects trade with China, technology supply chains, and U.S. national security protections.
What it does
Replaces the word “consultation” with “coordination” in the Export Control Reform Act (changing the interagency obligation language).
Allows the Secretaries of State, Defense, or Energy to submit new rule or amendment proposals to the Export Administration Review Board.
Requires the Board to vote on proposals within 30 days (with one Board-member-expandable 30-day extension) and mandates the Secretary begin rulemaking for proposals accepted by simple majority.
Directs the Secretary of State to review China’s military-civil fusion impacts on U.S. export controls within 30 days and report findings.
Requires consideration of policy changes within 90 days and a report to Congress within 150 days, including proposed rules and recommended legal changes.
Argument forFaster formal votes and clearer coordination can speed export-control responses to national-security risks posed by China’s military-civil fusion.
Argument againstThe short statutory timelines (30/90/150 days) risk producing rushed or incomplete technical analysis, leading to poor policy choices or enforcement gaps.
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
Where it stands
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
- To President
- Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
- 2026
- Apr 22Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session HeldLatest
- Apr 22Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 19.
- Mar 24Introduced in House
- Mar 24Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.Introduced
National SecurityTechnologyTrade