Land rent valuations under existing leases with operating hotels or motels would exclude unsecured housing bonuses
For existing leases on land with operating hotels or motels, the signed bill would keep housing density bonuses and related rule breaks out of rent valuations until the added rights are approved and secured.
1
What it does
For existing leases on land with operating hotels or motels, land values used to set rent would exclude housing density bonuses, related incentives, and waived building rules unless the added housing rights are approved and secured when valued.
Argument forPeople renting land with operating hotels or motels could avoid higher rent under existing leases based on housing density bonuses before those rights are approved and secured.
Argument againstOwners of land with operating hotels or motels might receive less rent under existing leases when housing density bonuses lack approved and secured rights.
More detail
Land values used to set or change rent would exclude housing density bonuses, related incentives, and waived building rules unless the added housing rights are approved and secured. This applies when setting or changing rent under an existing lease for land with an operating hotel or motel. It covers bonuses, incentives, and waivers under California's housing density bonus law. The added housing rights must be legally granted and secured. All required permits and land use approvals that officials must decide on must have been issued. The rules for getting a housing density bonus stay the same. The added housing rights must be approved and secured as of the date the land is valued.
2
Where do you stand?
Choose your position
3
Tell your reps
Take a position to see your representatives and ways to contact them.
4
More on this bill
Where it stands
Introduced
Passed Assembly
Passed Senate
To Governor
Became Law
Looking ahead
No hearings or votes scheduled.
History
2026
Sep 30Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 924, Statutes of 2026.Latest
Jun 25From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 24). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.Minor
Jun 24
Vote recorded Do pass, but first be re-referred to the Committee on [Local Government]. Result: pass.Upper
Jun 15Re-referred to Coms. on HOUSING and L. GOV.Minor
Jun 12Re-referred to Com. on RLS.Minor
Jun 12Withdrawn from committee.Major
Jun 11From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.Major
Jun 3Referred to Com. on E., U & C.Minor
May 21In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.Minor
Vote recorded AB 2181 Petrie-Norris Consent Calendar Second Day. Result: pass.Lower
May 21Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 0. Page 5229.)Passed Assembly
May 14Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.Minor
May 13From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 13).Minor
Vote recorded Do pass. To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Lower
Apr 23From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.Minor
Apr 22
Vote recorded Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Result: pass.Lower
Mar 2Referred to Com. on U. & E.Minor
Feb 20From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.