The signed law would require courts to order victim repayment during programs that pause criminal cases if a judge finds payment is owed, after a hearing, its waiver, or agreement on the amount.
Courts would order repayment during programs that pause criminal cases if victims are owed money. Defendants must be told they can ask a judge to set the amount and get a hearing, give one up, or agree on the amount.
Courts could not deny a program that pauses a criminal case, or say a person failed it, because poverty or a mental disorder kept them from repaying victims.
If a person leaves a program that pauses a criminal case or does not finish it, the court would have to pause the repayment order until the case is resolved.
Courts would have to order people in diversion programs to repay victims. The order covers victims owed repayment for losses caused by the offense handled through diversion. Defendants must be told they can ask a judge to decide the amount and must receive a hearing, give one up, or agree to the amount. If the court finds repayment is owed, it must order payment during diversion.
Courts could not deny diversion or find that a defendant failed it because they cannot repay victims. This protects defendants in diversion programs who cannot repay victims for those reasons. The inability to pay must be due to poverty or a mental disorder.
Courts would have to pause repayment orders. This covers repayment orders issued while a defendant was in a program that pauses a criminal case. The defendant must withdraw from diversion or fail to finish it. The pause lasts until the criminal case is resolved.
No hearings or votes scheduled.